Tools · Systemic Team Coaching

The five-disciplines team diagnostic.

Built on Peter Hawkins’ five disciplines of systemic team coaching. Score a leadership team as its leader sees it and as the team lives it — the gap between the two is where the coaching work begins. Browse a sample engagement, or enter your own team’s scores.

(a) — Engagement parameters & context

Configure the leadership remit, formal sponsor, and organizational context.

Lens: systemic team coaching

Hawkins five disciplines matrix

Leader self-assessment vs. team experience (0–100%).

Leader Team
CommissioningOuter-In High divergence (+26%)

Clarity of board/sponsor mandate, stakeholder expectations, boundary authorization, and collective purpose beyond self.

Bench: 68%
Leader perception88%
Team reality62%
ClarifyingInner-Task High divergence (+30%)

Shared vision, concrete OKRs/KPIs, mutual role boundaries, explicit operational contracts, and mutual peer accountability.

Bench: 72%
Leader perception84%
Team reality54%
Co-CreatingInner-Relational High divergence (+34%)

Psychological safety, generative debate, productive friction without defensiveness, and authentic interpersonal trust.

Bench: 64%
Leader perception76%
Team reality42%
ConnectingOuter-Relational

Proactive stakeholder resonance, client empathy, ecosystem diplomacy, and dismantling cross-functional silos.

Bench: 58%
Leader perception70%
Team reality58%
Core LearningInner-Reflective High divergence (+29%)

Disciplined debrief rhythms, reflective inquiry, capacity renewal, learning agility, and guarding against collective burnout.

Bench: 52%
Leader perception65%
Team reality36%

Qualitative intake & verbatim notes

Interview quotes, body language, backchannel signals, stakeholder observations.

779 characters